The irony is that I created this page for the opposite reason because Wikipedians deleted another page I created for Spirit of Librarianship and I was trying to make a point that they allow single-line pages for English villages or disposable reality TV contestants no one will remember in five years. Unluckily for me, Lukas is now about to enter his sixteenth minute of fame and may last a bit longer than I expected. (It's gone now but the last time I visited that page, one of the points added to the Trivia section was: "He's HOT!!!!!!!!"
)On a completely unrelated topic, I submitted "Useless As Tits on A Bull: User Fees in Alberta Public Libraries" to "Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Research and Practice" and just got back their feedback yesterday. They're not going to take it as submitted but encouraged me to re-submit after making some of the many changes they suggested. Luckily, I've been in a few writing groups in my life so am used to getting my work torn apart.
All aspects of this process have been very educational and helpful and, if you want to get some real feedback (as opposed to the little amount of feedback most professors have time to provide on your assignments), I encourage you to submit to a peer-reviewed journal.
Oh, and the title? Yep, that was one of the concerns one reviewer raised!
I personally don't see it - the phrase has no sexual connection at all but the word "tits" scares the heck out of some people. It's sort of like those people who were horrified when a parenting magazine printed a cover image of a woman breastfeeding! I repeat, a parenting magazine. 
